Skanda Sriganesh All work
Capital One · Enterprise Design Systems

Enterprise Design System

Platform and systems work that keeps a large design system healthy, evidence-driven, and compliant. Presented through three mini case studies: the thinking and impact behind the work, not flashy visual redesigns.

Much of this system is confidential. What follows is the scope, judgment, and outcomes I can share.

Mini case 01

Liquid Glass Adoption

Bringing Capital One's iOS design system into compliance with Apple's Liquid Glass mandate.

Role
Design systems · lead
Scope
iOS components, docs, training, cross-app alignment
Type
Platform compliance

TL;DR I audited the affected components, added Liquid Glass into the design system with Capital One branding where Apple allowed it, trained teams on the change, and reframed how we separate system UI from brand content.

Context

Apple mandated that iPhone apps adopt Liquid Glass, with compliance required for the next Xcode release. Existing components relied on customizations Apple no longer supports. At Capital One's enterprise scale, that meant aligning many teams and producing guidance and training that would actually stick.

What I did

  • Audited scoped components and wrote transition guidance.
  • Added Liquid Glass components to the internal design system, applying Capital One branding and customization wherever Apple's constraints allowed.
  • Updated documentation pages for each affected component.
  • Created and delivered training: what Liquid Glass is, why we are adopting it, and the benefits of stronger native support, faster access to Apple updates, less tech debt, and better maintainability.
  • Addressed accessibility considerations for the new treatments.
  • Coordinated across Capital One's app ecosystem, connecting with product teams and resolving concerns.
  • Reframed how the team thinks about components: Apple's system layer (controls and system UI) versus the content layer (where we express brand).

Outcomes

Introduced 10 new components and identified 3 enhancements for the near future. We are actively monitoring iOS 27 and what comes next.

Not a flashy visual project. It is the reality of keeping apps supported by the App Store and the platform they run on.

Mini case 02

Unifying the Digital Card Portfolio

One flexible component to bring cohesion across Capital One's fragmented digital card portfolio.

Role
Design systems · component lead
Scope
Credit, small business, and debit digital cards
Type
Unification · platform standards

TL;DR I replaced inconsistent card treatments with one flexible component, aligned credit, small business, and debit partners with brand, and designed for Dynamic Type, translation, and real viewports.

Context

Across the digital card portfolio, card types were created and rendered inconsistently. Physical cards are tightly regulated, and brand owns clear opinions on fonts, colors, and treatment. Digital cards had no equivalent cohesion. Separate teams and codebases owned the work: the card LOB for credit, small business for business cards, and the debit and bank side for debit.

What I did

  • Proposed a single component flexible enough for each card type to keep its identity while still reading as one Capital One portfolio.
  • Engaged partners across lines of business so teams aligned on the same wavelength.
  • Worked with brand so digital and physical cards feel like the same product family across mediums.
  • Designed for Spanish translation and longer character counts, different viewport behaviors, and Dynamic Type, because card details are critical and users need full visual control.
  • Brought the design in line with platform standards, including replacing the settings gear with an overflow icon.
Annotated shared digital card component showing header, card details, and optional linked-account regions.
Shared anatomy. One structure, defined regions.
Digital card component at compact and full sizes showing dynamic type reflow.
Dynamic Type. Compact to full, same component.
Card products shown in light mode and dark mode using shared tokens.
Light and dark. Same tokens across product lines.

Outcomes

Unified 20+ products under one component, eliminated redundant code, aligned teams to work through the design system, and brought the design into line with platform standards.

A Capital One card should feel like a Capital One card, regardless of medium.

Mini case 03

A Contribution Model for the Design System

A sandbox and promotion framework that turns real product work into evidence-based, standardized patterns.

Role
Design systems · process design
Scope
Figma sandbox, graduation criteria, kit promotion
Type
Governance · adoption

TL;DR I built a Figma sandbox so product teams can contribute working solutions, and defined a two-stage bar that has to be met before any pattern becomes a recommended standard.

Context

A dedicated design system team is not designing products day to day, so product teams have to feed back which solutions actually work. Before a solution becomes a recommended pattern others will adopt, you need confidence. Without that bar, you get either a bottleneck or a pile of one-offs.

What I did

I created a sandbox in Figma where teams could keep works in progress, and helped contributors reach defined benchmarks so their work could migrate into official kits and standards.

Sandbox objectives

  • Bridge gaps between the Capital One app and Gravity, the system's foundations and components.
  • Improve visibility and reduce duplicative effort.
  • Prevent fragmented logic.
  • Enable evidence-based promotion to official libraries.
  • Provide interim guidance for patterns that need it.

Two-stage promotion framework

Stage 01

Candidates

High potential for standardization. Recommendable to teams with similar needs.

Requirements

  • Stable design specs
  • Shared logic across use cases
  • Being tested in production
  • Uses Gravity tokens
  • Initial research attached and available
  • Designed for scalability, including cross-LOB
Stage 02

Ready for Promotion

Consolidates a pattern used by 3+ teams, or with 3+ potential implementations, or a high-volume feature. Finalized for official design system integration.

Requirements

  • Accessibility sign-off
  • Final production data and findings supporting promotion
  • Full design specs and completed documentation for handoff
  • Solved for iOS and Android, or a full web spec

Outcomes

Successfully onboarded projects onto the framework. The org now has a structured way to elevate promising work and sunset efforts that are not getting the research to justify promotion.

Governance and process work that keeps a design system healthy and evidence-driven.

Throughline

Systems stay healthy when craft, compliance, and contribution move together.

Across Liquid Glass, the digital card portfolio, and the contribution model, the work is the same job in different forms: align cross-functional partners, raise the bar with evidence, and leave the platform stronger than I found it.

Let's chat